Introduction: Hitchcock vs. the James
Bond Phenomenon
Michael Armstrong vs. James Bond
That Arresting Rhythm: John Addison, Bernard
Herrmann and John Barry
"A Visual Torn Curtain":
Opening Credits
Gromek vs. Red Grant
The Murders
Conclusion
|
Michael Armstrong vs. James Bond
However, despite certain parallels between Michael and
Bond, Hitchcock frequently makes direct contrasts between the two men.
The fact that in the scene discussed on the previous page Michael only
stirs his martini but never actually drinks it indicates that though
he might
be a spy,
he is no James Bond.
Moral Culpability
Neither man is presented as a completely
straightforward hero. However, though James Bond is frequently criticized
and labeled an “anti-hero” because of his cynicism, brutality,
and misogynistic attitude toward women, he is still a hero and the
primary object of identification within the films 22.
Michael, however, becomes morally culpable when the audience learns
that he is lying, stealing, and endangering lives for his own “selfish
ambitions” and that we do not know the outcome of his success—will
it or will it not end nuclear war? Perhaps, in the hands of a superpower
like the United States, this advanced missle knowledge will only lead
to an actual nuclear attack. There is no way of knowing 23.
Robin Wood insists that despite last minute commercial pressures to
tweak Michael into a more typical hero, “we are being discouraged
(unsuccessfully) from feeling the character to be as nasty as he in
fact is” 24.
 
Michael "battles" kindly Lindt and Bond enjoys Gypsy hospitality
Independence and Initiative
Michael’s dependence on others separates him from
Bond and in this respect he is a typical Hitchcock spy who cannot succeed
alone 25. Though Bond
is a professional spy while Michael is only an amateur like typical
Hitchcock spies, it is Michael who travels
of
his own volition while Bond is M’s “executive functionary,” taking
orders from his chief 26.
Both men have a group of contacts but Michael utilizes his to the extreme
while Bond seems
to
treat his more as friends. Michael must rely upon his
"friends in high places" who get him his initial contact,
the leaders of Pi, the
farm wife who helps him murder Gromek, Dr. Koska, the Countess Kuchinska
and even the cryptic Herr Albert in order to achieve his goal and ultimately
escape from East Germany. In fact, the person who becomes most indispensible
to his success is the person he spends most of the film refusing to
tell the truth to: Sarah. It is Sarah who flirts with Lindt, giving
Michael the chance to talk to him; who convinces Michael to help the
Countess so that she will help them; who finds the right door at the
theatre 27.
   
Michael's Life Lines
Bond, on the other
hand,
while he has
his contacts in Istanbul, namely Kerim Bey and his organization of
sons who help him gain blueprints of the Russian consulate and plan
escape
routes, he seems to be able to take care of himself. When chased
by a helicopter throwing grenades at him, he dispatches it with a shot
from
his rifle;
when chased by a team of
boats, he shoots at spilled fuel in the water and manages with two
shots to blow up every boat. Even when Rosa Klebb, the newly appointed
Number
Three at SPECTRE, seems to have Bond cornered and Tatiana comes to
the rescue, her intervention shows not so much Bond’s dependence
on her but her change in alliance. She assists Bond while breaking
her vow
to help Klebb and her original alliance to SPECTRE. In other words,
the audience does not really doubt that left on his own Bond could
not find
a way to defeat Klebb and bring the Lektor home to M.
   
Kerim Bey and Bond taking care of himself
|