Introduction: Hitchcock vs. the James
Bond Phenomenon
Michael Armstrong
vs. James Bond
That Arresting
Rhythm: Opening Credits and Murders
Conclusion
|
Sarah Sherman: Still
a Spoonful of Sugar?
Sarah
Sherman, played by the then very popular Julie Andrews, seems a direct
contrast to Tatiana and Bond Girls in general.
Even
though she and Michael go on their "honeymoon cruise" before
the wedding, she desires nothing more than to be married to Michael
and help him, to assist him. When he tells her that he must go to Stockholm
she wants to go with him, suggesting that they could get an apartment
and insisting, "I could look after you, shop, cook." Even
though her nametag reads Dr. Sarah Sherman she is never called anything
but Professor Armstrong's assistant and any research of her own that
she might have is overshadowed by Michael's Gamma Five project. Throughout
most of the film she is a perfect, submissive woman, rarely sexualize
and never exoticized, and a great deal of this derives from Julie Andrew's
previously established Mary Poppins-innocence 32.
She is modest and conservative and as such quite opposite from Tatiana
who is content to run around naked or nearly so.
  
One small love bite but otherwise
demure and modest
However, there is one moment where Sarah takes control
and stands up for herself. Robin Wood calls this the film's single "morally
pure gesture": Sarah decides not to talk to the East Germans about
Gamma Five. Though she has agreed to defect in order to be with Michael
and though she constantly refers to him about whether she should stay,
only wanting to be with him if he wants her with him, at this point
in the film she finally asserts what she wants. She refuses
to compromise her own integrity and patriotism and reveals the disgust
she feels
at Michael for defecting by shouting at him "You tell them! You tell them! You joined them, you're the one who sold out!" There follows the scene on
the hill where Michael convinces Sarah to help him by telling her the
truth. From this point on, Sarah becomes just as morally culpable as
Michael, joining him in his lying, stealing, and endangering of innocents 33.
Thus Sarah is almost an exact inverse of Tatiana; the former begins
as innocent and becomes corrupt through her involvement while the latter
begins as corrupt and by getting involved with the hero becomes redeemed.
 
Sarah's Moral Purity followed by her Moral
Corruption
At the end of the film it seems that the relationship
problems between Michael and Sarah have been solved as they hide under
a blanket, avoiding
reporters, and Sarah giggles Michael's name. Supposedly they will return
to America, get married and live happily ever after. However, Hitchcock
films rarely allow couples such undisputed closure. What kind of a
husband will Michael be? He has lied and kept very large secrets from
his fiance, putting his needs above her own. Perhaps, like Bond, sexual
attractiveness is all he has going for him as a man.

BACK
|